← Back to Bookshelf

If You're So Smart Then Why Aren't You Happy?

Raj Raghunathan

Why Read This

Why high achievers undermine their own happiness — and the habits that break the pattern.

As education, income, and career success rise, happiness flatlines — and often declines. Raghunathan discovered seven specific thinking patterns that sabotage wellbeing, including the relentless drive to be the best.

Pillar: Health Theme: Manage Your Emotions Read: ~13 min
10 Insights Worth the Read

The Book in Bullets

Everything Raghunathan wants you to walk away with

1

The relentless drive to be the best — the very trait that fuels achievement — is one of the biggest happiness killers.

Controlling for current status, the greater your need for superiority, the lower your happiness. The pursuit of superiority lowers happiness even when you win — because you adapt to each new level and immediately need more.

2

Smart people routinely sacrifice happiness for other goals — and most don't even realize they're doing it.

Under stress, 55% of students chose a higher-paying miserable job over a lower-paying enjoyable one. In calm conditions, only 26% made that choice. Stress makes us default to extrinsic rewards and forget what we actually want.

3

Money, fame, and status are mediums that distract you from the end goal — like chasing points instead of enjoying the candy.

When researchers introduced a points system between effort and candy, participants chose longer tasks to maximize points even though they ultimately wanted enjoyment. People get so caught up chasing money they forget why they wanted it.

4

Prioritize happiness — but don't pursue it. The distinction is everything.

Monitoring your happiness constantly is like watching yourself fall asleep — it keeps you awake. Instead, take steps that increase the odds of happiness (define it, build a portfolio of triggers), then stop measuring. It's the sleep strategy applied to wellbeing.

5

Materialism is one of the single biggest destroyers of happiness — and exposure to luxury goods makes it worse.

A 19-year study of 12,000 freshmen found those whose primary goal was making money were far less happy two decades later. Materialistic people are more self-centered, less compassionate, and more likely to suffer from mental disorders.

6

Flow — being fully absorbed in a challenging, meaningful activity — is the sustainable alternative to chasing superiority.

Flow doesn't come at anyone else's expense. People are inspired by seeing others in flow. It enhances both your happiness and others'. The factor separating truly great athletes from merely good ones is the ability to stay in the present moment.

7

Extrinsic rewards — carrots and sticks — reliably worsen performance by pulling you out of flow.

Across multiple studies, participants performed better without monetary pressure. When you're rewarded based on outcomes, you lose the ability to focus on process. The desire to be absorbed in meaningful work is a fundamental human need.

8

Your negative mental chatter isn't random noise — it's rooted in deep-seated goals, desires, and values that need examination.

Popping peppermints to cover bad breath treats the symptom, not the cause. The mental chatter exercise asks you to record thoughts honestly for two weeks without positive spin or closure — to understand what's really driving the negativity.

9

Happy people are more generous, volunteer more, and judge others more favorably — happiness makes you less selfish, not more.

The belief that happiness breeds selfishness is a misconception. People in happy moods contribute more to charity and donate blood more often. Happiness and kindness form a reinforcing cycle, not a trade-off.

10

We were happier as children — what we've learned since then about what to value is precisely what's hurting us.

We teach children to chase money, status, beauty, and power, and they lose sight of what actually makes them happy. The most miserable adult years typically fall between 40 and 50 — the peak of achievement-chasing. The fisherman was already living the banker's dream.

These notes are inspired by direct excerpts and woven together into a readable guide you can follow from start to finish.

If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You Happy?

By Raj Raghunathan


Introduction

We remember the past as having been more pleasant than it actually was, for two main reasons. First, we cope better with big negative events than we expect to—the impact of a romantic breakup or the failure to land a dream job seldom lingers as long as we think it will. Second, we give past negative events a positive spin over time: the heartbreak from a rejected prom date or the embarrassment from a failed exam eventually become stories that make life more colorful rather than casting a dark shadow. It is precisely because past negative events become more positive in memory that women agree to a second childbirth and authors agree to write a second book.

One of the most trying periods in life is adolescence, and research confirms the so-called midlife crisis—our most miserable days as adults typically fall between the ages of forty and fifty. The fact that we were happier as children raises an important question: what did we know as kids that we forget as adults? Or more to the point, what do we know now that is hurting our happiness?

Definition — The Mental Chatter Exercise

The mental chatter exercise calls for maintaining a brutally honest daily record of your naturally occurring thoughts over two weeks. Unlike a journal, you must resist steering thoughts in a positive direction or finding closure. The spontaneously occurring negative thoughts are not random—they are rooted in deep-seated goals, desires, and values. Attempting to override negative chatter with positive thinking is like popping peppermints to smother bad breath: it addresses the symptom but not the cause. To sustain well-being, you must gain a deeper understanding of the goals, desires, and values behind the negative mental chatter.

Although there is a small positive relationship between wealth and happiness, it is not as significant as one might expect. Fame, too, has little effect on happiness.

Thoughts related to inferiority are rooted in the tendency to engage in social comparisons—“keeping up with the Joneses”—which in turn is rooted in the desire for superiority. Thoughts about lack of love and connectivity are rooted in relationship insecurities, manifested through either neediness (relationship anxiety) or avoidance. Thoughts about lack of control are rooted in the desire for control and the tendency to be a “maximizer”—someone with an irrepressible urge to make things better.

Key Insight

Many of us believe the need for superiority is a key determinant of success, that emotional distance defines strong leaders, and that controlling others and the environment is the path to achievement. Evidence does not support any of these beliefs. The need for superiority is overall more a hindrance than a help in achieving goals. The world’s best leaders are not emotionally distant but compassionate and kind. Being overly controlling is not the optimal way to succeed. It is best to let go of the behaviors fueling negative mental chatter and replace them with more productive ones—doing so improves both happiness and your odds of success.

Chapter 1

The First Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Devaluing Happiness

Imagine you are in a satisfying romantic relationship, but you want your partner to lose weight. You give good advice for months, but he never follows it. Then one day he comes home excited about a new lifestyle plan from someone else—a plan nearly identical to what you had been recommending all along. Would you (A) angrily point out that this is nothing new, or (B) congratulate him for figuring it out? In studies, 85 percent recognized Option B was better for happiness—in relationships, you can often either be right or be happy, not both. Yet when a different group chose for themselves, only 72 percent selected B. About one in eight people were willing to sacrifice happiness for the sake of “being right.”

Consider another scenario: Job A is high-paying with great career prospects but uninteresting, stressful, long-hours work among difficult colleagues. Job B pays half as much—enough for a decent life but not wealth—yet the work is enjoyable and the people are genuinely nice. When asked which option better enhances happiness, 78 percent chose Job B. But when conditions simulating competitive job-interview stress were introduced, choices shifted dramatically: 55 percent in the “job stress” group and 44 percent in a milder “personality stress” group chose the higher-paying job. The more a situation induces stress—especially the kind associated with career competition—the more likely you are to sacrifice happiness for extrinsic rewards.

Principle

Although happiness is a very important goal for most people, they routinely devalue it as they go about their lives—sacrificing it for the sake of other goals like money, status, or being right.

The First Habit of the Highly Happy: Prioritizing—But Not Pursuing—Happiness

A rich American banker vacationing in a small Mexican fishing village strikes up conversation with a local fisherman and realizes the man is sharp enough for Wall Street. He suggests the fisherman become an investment banker to earn big money. “And then?” the fisherman asks. “You could retire early and settle down in a small village like this one and fish all day!” the banker replies—not realizing the fisherman already has exactly the life the banker dreams of reaching.

Many of us harbor the misconception that happiness will make us selfish. In fact, findings show the opposite: happy people volunteer more, judge others more favorably, share their fortune more equitably, contribute more to charity, and are more likely to donate blood.

Definition — Medium Maximization

Medium maximization is the propensity to forget the end goal you want to achieve and pursue the means (or mediums) to that goal instead. In experiments, when no medium was present, participants chose a short task; when a medium (points) was introduced, they favored a longer task—because the medium distracted them from what they ultimately wanted (enjoyment) and made them focus on maximizing points. People can get so caught up chasing money that they forget why they wanted it in the first place. And money is not the only distracting medium—the desire to be right, or to have beauty, fame, or prestige, can be equally distracting.

A key finding: the likelihood of happiness appearing on people’s wish lists shoots up when they are simply reminded about it. This suggested that gentle reminders could help overcome devaluing happiness. In one study, a group receiving daily email reminders to make happiness-enhancing decisions for a week were far happier by the end than a control group, because they made better choices—like going to a kids’ baseball game rather than sitting at home watching TV.

But although reminding yourself works, there is an important caveat: do not pursue or chase happiness directly. When you pursue happiness, you compare how you feel with how you would ideally like to feel, and since you generally want to feel happier than you currently do, you end up feeling unhappy about being unhappy. The question becomes: how do you prioritize happiness without pursuing it? Think of sleep. Constantly monitoring whether you are about to fall asleep is a recipe for insomnia. A better approach is to take steps that increase the odds of sleeping—eating a light dinner, working out, avoiding arguments—and then stop monitoring. In the same way, you should take steps that increase the odds of being happy and then let go.

Action — Two Steps for the First Happiness Exercise
1
Define happiness
Have a concrete idea of what happiness means to you personally.
2
Incorporate happiness
Build a portfolio of reliable happiness determinants into your life.

As Daniel Kahneman has noted, there are two types of happiness. One concerns immediate, visceral feelings—how pleasant or unpleasant you feel right now. The other involves a more holistic assessment of life satisfaction. The former depends on immediate circumstances (feeling sick today, or having just had a great meal), while the latter reflects the bigger picture (your bank balance, the quality of your relationships). You could feel satisfied with your life overall yet be unhappy at the level of immediate emotions—or vice versa.

Research asking people to recollect events that made them happy found that people predominantly associate “happiness” with four types of emotions. Love/connection is the feeling associated with intimacy—with a person, pet, activity, event, or object. Joy stems from feeling that life is going well, that it is safe to let your guard down and be playful. Authentic pride is the feeling of having achieved something important and worthwhile. Hubristic pride arises from recognizing “I am special, superior”—involving comparison with others and a perception of one’s own superiority. Beyond these four, Barbara Fredrickson and colleagues have identified at least seven other positive emotions people experience regularly, including serenity, awe, inspiration, interest, and hope.

Definition — Harmony & Abundance

Harmony is the feeling that arises from not wanting to be somewhere else, doing something else. Abundance is the feeling that results from the belief that you have enough—indeed, more than enough—of anything you could want from life. Abundance stems from the belief that, no matter how dire a situation, every little thing will be all right in the end. When you feel abundant, life seems like a cozy mess: perfect despite its imperfections. Both share a rare combination of full acceptance and full engagement—including the desire to change things. Both hinge less on external circumstances and more on the internal capacity to deal with whatever comes your way.

Once you have defined happiness, the second step is to recall previous occasions when you felt happy in that way and identify the determinants—friends, vacations, running, mindfulness, whatever triggered it. By defining happiness concretely, you give it greater prominence; we give greater importance to things that are easier to process. By identifying your reliable happiness determinants, you recognize the kinds of judgments and decisions you need to make. It is precisely because we teach children to value money, status, beauty, and power that they learn to lose sight of what makes them truly happy.

Chapter 2

The Second Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Chasing Superiority

Beyond the desire for others’ approval and self-esteem, the need for mastery is another reason we seek superiority. Research reveals that status matters for two main reasons: those higher in status enjoy better self-esteem and perceive themselves to have greater autonomy and control over their decisions—both of which boost happiness.

Key Insight

Although being superior enhances happiness levels, the pursuit of superiority lowers them. Controlling for current status, the greater the need for superiority, the lower the happiness. Regardless of how wealthy, famous, powerful, or attractive you are compared with others, the more you strive for superiority, the less happy you will be.

The proxy yardsticks of wealth, power, and fame—while quantifiable—come with a heavy problem: they focus us on accumulating extrinsic, materialistic rewards, and such a focus is one of the biggest happiness killers. We adapt to new levels of wealth, power, and fame, which means tethering happiness to superiority requires becoming increasingly wealthy, powerful, and famous just to maintain the same level of satisfaction.

Materialism also promotes self-centeredness and lowers compassion, making others less likely to cooperate with materialistic people. Materialistic people are more likely to sacrifice things that actually bring joy—hanging out with friends, contributing to society—in favor of money, power, and fame. A study tracking twelve thousand college freshmen over nineteen years showed that those for whom “making money” was the primary goal were far less happy two decades later. Other findings reveal materialistic people are more likely to suffer from mental disorders.

Our perceived sense of superiority is affected more by how our acquaintances—rather than close friends or family—perceive us. And findings are clear: the less attention you pay to how much better or worse than others you are, the happier you will be. To lead a happier life, you need to mitigate the need for superiority without jeopardizing your chances of success.

Action — Watch for Superiority Triggers

  • Watch for situations that make you feel insecure—insecurity is when you are most likely to seek superiority.
  • Be wary of exposure to symbols of material success (luxury goods), which makes you more self-centered and materialistic.

The Second Habit of the Highly Happy: Pursuing Flow

Is there something common to the experiences that people from all walks of life—plumbers, artists, businesspeople, scientists—find meaningful? The answer is flow.

Definition — Three Features of Flow

  • Altered sense of time: Paradoxically, time appears to both slow down and speed up during flow.
  • Lack of self-consciousness: You become so absorbed that no leftover attentional capacity exists for self-evaluation. It is only after flow ends or an external trigger interrupts it that you can step back and assess your performance.
  • Being in the moment: You are acutely focused on the task at hand—fully engrossed in the next immediate subgoal. You do not actively push away thoughts of the future; the present-moment focus is a natural by-product of absorption.

The desire to be absorbed in flow appears to be a fundamental need. Flow is most likely when you are challenged, but not by too much or too little—ideally when your opponent’s or task’s difficulty is just ever so slightly above your own skill level. Such situations ensure you are learning and growing even as you are engaged.

Flow enhances not just your own happiness but also that of those around you. People are inspired by seeing others in flow—whether a band rocking at a concert or a passionate professor lecturing on a favorite topic. Because one person’s flow does not come at the cost of another’s, pursuing flow is a far more sustainable source of happiness than chasing superiority. By contrast, extrinsic rewards are limited: an increase in one person’s wealth, power, or fame has to come at the cost of another’s.

Principle

Our processing capacity is limited. The more of it we allocate to thoughts of wealth, fame, power, or other yardsticks of superiority, the less capacity remains for the task at hand. It is when we forget about extrinsic rewards and focus on the process that we make the most progress. The factor differentiating truly great athletes from merely good ones is not physical or technical ability—it is the mental ability to forget what just happened, not think about what might happen, and pay attention to what is happening right now.

Multiple studies show a consistent pattern: participants perform better without the pressure of monetary rewards. Extrinsic incentives—carrots and sticks—worsen rather than improve performance because they distract from getting into flow. When rewarded or punished based on outcomes, we lose the ability to focus on the process of goal pursuit.

Because flow is a critical determinant of both happiness and success, and because we spend the bulk of our waking life at work, finding flow at work matters deeply. If you are not already doing it, reconnect with a hobby. Identify where your talents lie and try to nurture them in your current job—even if that means taking on more responsibility or bending your job description. Identify what the community needs and find ways to meet those needs. And get to do more of the things you enjoy at work—it is often easier to answer “What do I enjoy doing?” than “What am I really good at?” or “What does the world need?”

Even if you enjoy something, building expertise takes dedication and what Angela Duckworth calls “grit.” The process is often painful in the short run, but this pain is worth enduring because it serves the goal of building expertise—which is essential to experiencing “high flow.”

Key Insight — The Slow Transition

Research finds that those who spend a few hours every week exposing themselves to people and activities involved in a more meaningful job are often better off than those who abruptly quit their current job to take up another. The “slow and organic” path to transitioning from an unsatisfying job to a more meaningful one is generally a better strategy than jumping ship one fine day.

Framework Snapshot — From Superiority to Flow
DimensionSuperiority RouteFlow Route
Core driverExternal ranking and comparisonAbsorption, mastery, meaningful process
Attention patternOutcome-focused and status-sensitiveProcess-focused and present-centered
Effect on happinessShort-lived, unstable, easily threatenedSustainable and shareable with others
Effect on performanceDistracts under reward pressureImproves quality through full engagement

Chapter 3

The Third Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Desperation for Love

Harlow’s classic experiments with baby monkeys reveal how fundamental love is. When exposed to a threatening object, distressed baby monkeys always sought out a cloth-and-foam mother figure rather than a wire-mesh one. Young monkeys reared with real mothers and playmates easily learned to socialize; those raised with cloth-and-foam mothers were slower but caught up within a year. But monkeys raised with only wire-mesh mothers became socially incompetent—and the adult females who did have babies were neglectful of them. The capacity for love and nurturance depends on whether you yourself were sufficiently loved and nurtured.

Being in love feels positive, potent, and powerful all at once, and is universally rated as one of our most cherished experiences. We also have a “herd mentality”: Asch’s classic conformity experiments (and many replications since) show that people feel compelled to agree with others even when they know the others are wrong.

In one set of experiments, participants paired with a confederate watched entertaining or boring videos together. One would think video quality would be the primary driver of enjoyment—but perceived agreement with the confederate was far more potent. Watching boring videos was more enjoyable when the confederate appeared to agree than watching entertaining videos when the confederate appeared to disagree. We care far more about whether others agree or disagree with us than about the objective quality of our shared experiences.

Key Insight

Feeling lonely is perhaps the single biggest determinant of a host of psychological and physiological illnesses—depression, insomnia, obesity, diabetes. Importantly, it is perceived (not actual) loneliness that matters. A study tracking 268 men from college in 1938 through the late 2000s found that the strength of social relationships was the only characteristic distinguishing the happiest 10 percent from the rest. Being socially excluded activates the same brain regions as physical pain.

But as critical as being loved is for happiness, the pursuit of this desire can also cause great misery. There is a thin line between a healthy desire for love and an unhealthy one. Being needy turns people off—partly because needy people are too easily available and we are programmed to devalue what is easily accessible, and partly because neediness triggers loneliness as others tend to avoid the needy.

Although avoidants view themselves as strong and independent, this self-view is mostly a façade. At a deeper level, avoidants are just as eager for love and connection as the needy, but they want others to take the initiative. When that initiative is not forthcoming—which is often, since being avoidant is not endearing—avoidants end up isolated and bereft of meaningful connections.

Fortunately, attachment style can be altered. One study showed that mere exposure to words connoting intimacy (“love,” “hugs”) can at least temporarily boost feelings of relationship security. Another showed that recalling childhood instances of love and nurturance can temporarily increase security. Two practices with immense potential for mitigating neediness and avoidance are expressing gratitude—which research shows enriches social life—and self-compassion, which deactivates the “threat system” (associated with insecurity and defensiveness) and activates the “self-soothing” system (associated with secure attachment).

The Third Habit of the Highly Happy: The Need to Love (and Give)

People have an innate desire to help others. In a survey posing the question of whether spending money on yourself or on someone else would make you happier, 63 percent predicted self-spending would win. They were wrong: you would in fact have been happier spending the money on someone else. The effect of charitable giving on life satisfaction is not trivial—it has the same effect as doubling household income.

Why does generosity boost happiness? First, it takes the focus away from your own worries and toward others’. Second, people reciprocate kindness, which boosts their happiness in return. Third—and perhaps most compellingly—when you are nice to others, you tell yourself a story that you are kind and big-hearted, feeling more capable, effective, and abundant. Remarkably, you do not need to be extravagantly generous—even a small gesture will do.

Key Insight — Givers Succeed

Those who are kind and generous—“givers”—are most likely to succeed, even in business. For every extra dollar earned, charitable giving goes up by 14 cents. But for every dollar donated, income goes up by $3.75—a 375 percent return. “Work altruists” (who provide as much as twenty times more support than “work isolators”) are six times as likely to be promoted.

Does this mean the more you give, the happier you will be? No. Although generosity boosts happiness, it also takes energy and resources, and giving beyond a point leads to burnout. Caretakers of Alzheimer’s patients are three times as likely to be depressed as the average person. Studies show givers are both the most likely and the least likely to succeed—because there are two categories. “Selfless givers” give so indiscriminately they burn out and end up at the bottom. “Otherish givers” are smart about generosity and often rise to the top. Both are equally well intentioned; what differentiates them is that otherish givers are better at identifying when, how much, how, and to whom to give.

Action — Essential Rules for Otherish Giving

  • Contain the cost of giving: Maximize the positive effects of your generosity. If multiple people need the same type of help, address their needs simultaneously. If someone else would be a better source of help, connect them. Be efficient in practicing generosity.
  • Value expansion: Manage your emotional resources so you don’t burn out. Take authentic pride in the beneficial ripples your actions generate. Feel grateful to be in a position to give, which energizes continued generosity.
  • See the impact of your giving: Those who witness the impact of their generosity derive the biggest boost in happiness.

Principle — Bad Is Stronger Than Good

Negative stimuli have a bigger psychological impact than positive ones of equal magnitude. It takes as many as five positive remarks from a significant other to compensate for one negative remark. It takes three positive experiences to compensate for a single negative one.

Chapter 4

The Fourth Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Being Overly Controlling

Terror Management Theory (TMT) reveals that when asked to contemplate death, people become even more deeply attached to their previously held values, ideals, and worldviews. The fear of death evokes feelings of uncertainty and lack of control, so people gravitate toward whatever makes them feel more in control. This is how we deal with all types of uncertainty: by seeking to make things more certain.

The need for control also manifests through the “illusion of control”—the belief that we wield greater control over outcomes than we actually do. In one lottery study, participants who chose their own tickets were more reluctant to trade them for tickets with a higher chance of winning, because the act of choosing felt like it magically improved their odds. This illusion may explain why most people are less afraid of driving than flying, even though accident odds are far greater when driving.

The deep-seated desire for control serves at least two important purposes. First, it feeds a sense of self-efficacy—the belief that you can shape outcomes to your liking—which boosts well-being through a feeling of competence and progress toward mastery. Second, it serves the goal of autonomy. Given these benefits, it is no surprise we seek control. But seeking control is a good thing only up to a point. Those with a higher need for control generally set loftier goals and achieve more, yet being too control-seeking—constantly seeking to make things better or obsessing about outcomes—lowers happiness beyond a tipping point.

Principle

In relationships, you can either have control over others or you can have their love—not both.

The desire for autonomy is particularly pronounced among two-year-olds and teenagers. When you seek to control others, they exhibit psychological reactance: your attempt to control a spouse’s diet may be met with increased consumption of unhealthy food, and your attempt to make kids finish homework may be met with grumpiness or revolt. Overly controlling others also produces what David McClelland calls “power stress”—the tendency to get angry and frustrated when others do not behave as you want. You set yourself up for anger, frustration, and disappointment. You also drive away those who disagree with you, surrounding yourself with “yea-sayers,” which degrades decision-making.

Being overly controlling of outcomes is not the same as being keen to achieve results. Having goals boosts happiness. You cross the line when the desire to achieve outcomes controls you rather than you being in control of it. When life does not go according to plan—which happens regularly—those high in need for control suffer more: their blood pressure rises, they take greater risks, and they become more superstitious in stressful situations. When you want to control something so badly that you are obsessed, you are likely to sacrifice other things that make you happy.

One way to mitigate the desire for control is to learn to appreciate uncertainty. We all know at some level that uncertainty is important—which is why we avoid spoiler alerts before a movie and would not watch the end of a recorded game before the rest. Another way to feel less time-scarce, counterintuitively, is to engage in social service—those who do tend to feel more time abundant. Exposure to awe-inducing images—whales, waterfalls, and the like—also slows the perception of time, creating time affluence. But of all the ways to mitigate the desire for control, the one with the best potential is to take what one might call “internal control.”

The Fourth Habit of the Highly Happy: Gaining Internal Control

Our imagined enjoyment of events is almost always greater than our actual enjoyment. We consistently overpredict how much we will enjoy positive events—and we overpredict for negative events too. This is why heart attacks are more common on Monday mornings, before the workweek has really begun, than at any other time of the week. We remember past vacations as more enjoyable than they were because we selectively reminisce about the positive events.

Key Insight — Thoughts Shape Feelings

By merely changing the content of your thoughts, you can control your feelings. Rather than feeling angry at your boss for not giving you a raise, you could feel gratitude if you focused on the fact that you still have a job. Rather than feeling sad that your partner is leaving town, you could feel happy by focusing on the fun you had together. This does not mean you should always feel happy—sometimes sadness or contrition is appropriate—but if you often wish you could feel happier, this principle matters.

Taking personal responsibility for your happiness means never blaming someone else or the circumstances for how you feel. It means figuring out ways to be happy despite others’ actions and external events. Although external circumstances control your external state (the outcomes you experience), they do not control your internal state (your feelings). This perspective lets you retain the keys to your happiness in your own hands. When you gain sufficient internal control, you no longer feel the need to control others or external circumstances as much.

Developing internal control is similar to building muscle: you are more likely to build it when you exercise with appropriate weights—challenges commensurate with your current abilities, neither too light nor too heavy.

Action — Four Emotion Regulation Tactics

  • Situation selection: Choose situations that are more likely to produce positive feelings.
  • Emotion labeling: Come up with a label to describe what you are feeling—e.g., “I am feeling angry.” Merely labeling feelings lowers their intensity. (Most people predict labeling will intensify feelings, but labeling is different from ruminating—it means noting the feeling and moving on.)
  • Attention deployment: Redirect your attention toward more positive aspects of a situation.
  • Cognitive reappraisal: Reinterpret a negative situation to feel better about it—e.g., telling yourself that work stress is a “first world problem” you should feel privileged to have. This involves putting things in perspective.

In executing these tactics, it is important to avoid self-serving bias. It is equally important to avoid suppressing negative feelings—suppression does not mitigate them, because the brain regions activated by negative emotions remain active even when you suppress the feelings. Suppression also consumes brain capacity, leaving less for the task at hand. And when you suppress feelings, others usually sense it, which increases their stress and lowers how much they like you.

An arguably more powerful way to take internal control is to lead a healthier lifestyle, which involves three components: eating right, moving more, and sleeping better. Each has a big positive effect on both physical and mental health, making you feel good from the inside out and improving your ability to handle stress.

Key Insight — Sitting and Sleep

Sitting for more than six hours a day greatly increases the chance of early death—it is just as bad as smoking for heart-disease risk. Even vigorous daily exercise may not fully counteract the effects of prolonged sitting; among heavy exercisers, those who spent most of their time sitting still had a 50 percent greater risk of death. You cannot sit all day and exercise for one hour and think you are safe—you need to move regularly throughout the day. On sleep: 95 percent of people need seven to nine hours per night. Only 2.5 percent feel well-rested with less than seven hours. Getting ninety minutes less than you need lowers daytime alertness by a third.

Most people recognize the importance of a healthier lifestyle but are terrible at translating this into action. The “schedule partner project” is based on an interesting finding: you are much more likely to achieve a goal when pursuing it alongside someone else rather than all by yourself.

Chapter 5

The Fifth Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Distrusting Others

In general, the more prosperous a country, the happier its citizens, and people living in stable democracies are happier than those in violent autocracies. However, something else matters more than economic prosperity or political ideology: trust. The more citizens of a country respond that “most people can be trusted” rather than “you need to be very careful in dealing with people,” the happier those citizens are.

In one study, researchers “accidentally” left twelve wallets containing the equivalent of about $50 in sixteen cities around the world; each wallet also contained the owner’s address. The proportion of wallets returned served as a proxy for trustworthiness—and once again, trust turned out to be a major determinant of happiness: the greater the proportion returned, the happier the country.

When you cannot trust your friends to split a bill equitably, or trust colleagues to keep a secret, you cannot relax—and when you cannot relax, you cannot be happy. Many of us cannot bring ourselves to trust others because of hardwired cynicism. Yet if everyone—or at least a critical mass—could overcome this predisposition by proactively trusting others, mutual trust would build and everyone’s happiness would benefit.

Principle

It takes as many as five trustworthy behaviors to overcome the negative feelings generated by just one untrustworthy behavior.

The Fifth Habit of the Highly Happy: Exercising “Smart Trust”

People’s propensities—attitudes, behaviors—are not set in stone; they are more fluid. Few people are unqualified saints or unequivocal devils. The factor that holds the most sway over which propensity we exhibit in any given moment is the context. In a context where saintliness is expected and everyone is behaving accordingly, we are likely to do the same. In a context where “devilishness” is permitted or actively encouraged, we drift the other way. In other words, few people are always trustworthy or always untrustworthy.

Key Insight — Practicing Smart Trust

Before trusting someone, decide that you will not let them go scot-free if they cheat you—tell yourself you will chase them down and give them a piece of your mind. The purpose is not revenge; it is to understand what led them to violate your trust. Knowing is understanding, and understanding is forgiving.

Consider this thought experiment: think of someone you dislike. Now imagine you were born with their genetic material—their looks, intelligence, aptitudes—and had their upbringing, their parents, their neighborhood, their school, their friends. Do you think you would behave any differently? Once this realization sinks in, you are naturally more likely to get past the knee-jerk tendency to judge others’ behaviors as “good” and “bad” and move to the next step: trying to understand why people behave the way they do.

Chapter 6

The Sixth Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Passionate/Indifferent Pursuit of Passion

At some level, we all know—or should know—that we lack the ability to figure out all the downstream consequences of any outcome. Because of this, we also lack the knowledge to calculate its overall impact on our lives. An outcome that currently seems positive (like marrying a sweetheart) may well turn out to be negative, and an outcome that seems negative (like a divorce) may later prove to be the best thing that happened. Life is unpredictable and whimsical, and as such, we should not hold strong views about the goodness and badness of outcomes we experience.

Principle

We are happier when busy than when idle, and even happier when doing something meaningful rather than meaningless. This implies that we do not need to depend on outcomes for happiness—we could derive all our happiness from the process of working toward them. You could derive happiness from preparing for an exam or planning a vacation, rather than from the exam result or the vacation itself.

“Delinking happiness from outcomes” means judging outcomes only after they have occurred, not before. This approach—the sixth habit of the highly happy—is called the dispassionate pursuit of passion: having a preference for certain outcomes before they occur, but being nonjudgmental about them after they occur.

The Sixth Habit of the Highly Happy: Dispassionate Pursuit of Passion

Our feelings toward both negative and positive events generally become less intense with time. What is interesting is that this change is more pronounced for negative events—they lose their sting more rapidly than positive ones lose their glow. You will likely continue to savor the feelings from a first kiss or a great vacation long after they are over, but not harbor negative feelings about a financial scam or a failed exam for as long.

Key Insight

People find past negative events to be significantly more meaningful than past positive ones, because negative events provide far greater opportunity for growth and learning. Some time must pass before this becomes apparent—you cannot easily see meaning in events that have recently transpired. But the past events we find the most meaningful are often the ones we were the most intensely negative about when they occurred.

There are several reasons why feelings toward past negative events change. Negative events make us learn and grow—we are likely to be more compassionate and kind if we have experienced pain and suffering. They make us wiser, more capable of handling life’s curveballs. They afford “bragging rights”—a grueling hike or a disgusting cultural delicacy become great stories. And they make us feel stronger and more resilient when we realize we have lived through them.

Placebo effects demonstrate that our beliefs can shape our reality—if you believe a pill will cure a disease, there is an objectively greater chance it will. Not every subjective belief shapes objective reality (no matter how firmly you believe the Earth has two moons, it will not change), but in some contexts, our subjective beliefs undeniably do. Findings from religion and spirituality show that those who hold a spiritual attitude lead happier lives. Likewise, optimists and those with a more positive outlook are happier than their more pessimistic counterparts.

Chapter 7

The Seventh Deadly Happiness “Sin”: Mind Addiction

That many of our decisions are based on emotions is not news, nor is the fact that we often justify emotional decisions with “rational” reasons—hence the term post hoc rationalization. What is noteworthy, however, is that we feel uneasy admitting our decisions are driven by feelings, because of an implicit assumption: that feelings serve to hinder, rather than enhance, the quality of our judgments and decisions.

Definition — Mind Addiction

“Mind addiction” refers to the tendency to ignore or underestimate the importance of gut instincts and feelings. It stems from two interrelated beliefs: (1) that the most reliable way to solve any problem is through thoughtful deliberation, and (2) that feelings and gut instincts serve more to detract from, rather than enhance, the quality of judgments and decisions.

One reason “thinking too much” gets in the way of happiness-maximizing choices is that thoughts distract us from the intelligence in our feelings. Our gut instincts are not random or arbitrary—they are the repository of useful information that served us well in our adaptive past. We also underestimate feelings because we tend to seek quantifiable goals (losing a certain number of pounds, amassing a certain amount of wealth), and thoughtful deliberation seems better suited to such goals.

Yet deliberation can only go so far in generating ideas, particularly inspiring ones. Our most inspiring ideas are almost always the product of the subconscious. Without the cooperation of feelings and gut instincts, deliberation would be severely handicapped—because ultimately, the source of all of our ideas is our subconscious. This is why our best ideas come to us when we are not actively thinking about the problem, but rather thinking of something else entirely.

Another set of problems rooted in mind addiction involves lack of self-awareness, which is one of the biggest happiness killers. Without self-awareness, you are unlikely to recognize the ways you may be sabotaging your own happiness. For example, you might be deeply status-conscious but wish to believe you couldn’t care less about superiority; you might be insecure in relationships but convince yourself you are the epitome of secure attachment. The less self-aware you are, the more easily you pull off this self-delusion. The more sensible thing is to stop deluding yourself and become more honest so you can get to the bottom of the ways you may be undermining your own well-being.

Key Insight — When to Use Deliberation vs. Gut Feel

The decision of whether to go with gut feel or thoughtful deliberation is ultimately more art than science. One context in which deliberation may be better is when making a decision on behalf of a group, particularly if the outcome is functional (like recruiting for an open position) rather than hedonic (like choosing a venue for a party)—because people like those who make decisions based on deliberation more than those who rely on feelings.

The Seventh Habit of the Highly Happy: Mindfulness

Definition — GATEs

We are immersed in a web of GATEs—Goals, Actions (or Action-tendencies), Thoughts, and Emotions. Life involves being caught in a web of consequences that experiences, interacting with the GATEs of our mind, weave for us. Getting shouted at by a boss may trigger anger, which triggers thoughts of revenge, which trigger actions, which trigger other feelings, and so on.

One way to break a negative GATE web is to step outside the GATE of your head—to merely observe what is going on, to be a fly on the wall of your mind. Taking the perspective of bare attention means observing things as if they were happening to someone else, and if done right—if you manage to keep the mind’s commentary out of it—you actually get closer to the object of observation. What the mind labels “anxiety,” for example, reduces to sensations like clammy palms, a slightly faster heart rate, and butterflies in the stomach—nothing inherently scary or unpleasant. But when those sensations are judged, categorized, and ruminated upon, they take on an ominous flavor and persist because the mental activity keeps the GATE web alive. By merely observing a negative feeling, you allow the GATE web to slow down and the negative feelings to die more quickly.

“Mind-wandering” is roughly the opposite of being mindful. Research found that regardless of whether an activity was pleasant or not, participants were less happy when mind-wandering than when present. You are always better off—in terms of happiness—being mindful than not.

Principle — Behavior Shapes Attitude

We all know that attitudes affect behavior—a person who believes “life is a zero-sum game” is more likely to seek superiority. What many of us don’t realize is that behavior also affects attitudes. Someone who regularly practices gratitude will likely become less prone to chasing superiority. Practicing kindness and compassion will likely mitigate neediness and avoidance. One reason is self-perception: when we observe ourselves behaving compassionately, we conclude our attitude must be consistent with that behavior. Behaving as if we are compassionate, even when we don’t really feel it, eventually leads us to think and feel like a compassionate person.

Happy people are in the moment, as findings on flow reveal, and a prominent feature of mindfulness is also being in the moment—so it follows that mindfulness makes you happy. Practicing mindfulness also lowers activation of the amygdala (associated with worrying and stress), simultaneously thickening brain areas associated with positivity and deactivating areas associated with stress. Those who practiced mindfulness were far less prone to stress when asked to give a speech or perform calculations in front of an audience. Mindfulness also improves workplace success by boosting “response flexibility”—the ability to pause before acting or reacting, fostering more conscious reactions to situations.

Mindfulness is not about not thinking. Rather, it is about changing your relationship with thoughts.

Action — Three Reminders for Each Mindfulness Session

  • Each session is new—don’t have any expectations.
  • The only goal is to be a fly on the wall; no other goal matters.
  • When you deviate, use a combination of self-compassion and dispassionate pursuit of passion to course-correct.

Most people find it easier to observe a bodily sensation rather than what is going on in the mind. Observing the breath is perhaps the easiest way to practice mindfulness: it is constantly changing—you are always breathing in, breathing out, or holding your breath—so it is more interesting to observe than the sensations in your hands, yet not so much in flux as your thoughts that it becomes difficult to observe.

Chapter 8: The Road Ahead

A bird’s-eye view of the book reveals that, once basic necessities are met, we need three main things to be happy.

Core Needs for Happiness (MBA)
Mastery
Need to feel good at something
Can be chased via superiority
Better route: flow + internal control
Belonging
Need intimacy and connection
Can collapse into neediness/avoidance
Better route: love, giving, trust
Autonomy
Need to author your choices
Can become external control obsession
Better route: internal control + mindfulness

The fulfillment of Mastery, Belonging, and Autonomy, while necessary, is not sufficient. What is also critical is using the right route. There are two routes to each: for Mastery, pursuing superiority versus pursuing flow; for Belonging, desperation for love versus the need to love and give; for Autonomy, external control versus internal control.

Key Insight — Scarcity vs. Abundance

The three “sin” routes to MBA stem from a scarcity orientation. The three alternative routes stem from an abundance orientation. It is when you feel adequately taken care of that you pursue something for its enjoyment (flow) rather than for extrinsic rewards. It is when you feel abundant—like a king or queen—that you feel truly capable of generosity. It is when you feel confident to handle whatever life throws at you that you feel comfortable letting go of external control and seeking internal control instead. The recipe for happiness ultimately boils down to weaning yourself from a scarcity orientation toward an abundance orientation.

Apart from boosting happiness, success, and altruism at the personal level, this shift is likely to boost meaningful productivity at the societal level. As Sonja Lyubomirsky notes, the level of material comfort you experience today is equivalent to how the top 5 percent lived a mere half century ago. With each passing year, more people know from personal experience that greater wealth does not automatically translate into greater happiness, leading to a genuine interest in the determinants of fulfillment.

Cultural inertia is a big reason people think and act in ways antithetical to happiness. Another is the evaluability of goals—people accord greater importance to goals that are easier to measure, even if those goals are less important.

Action — Daily Peer Coach Questions
  • Did I do my best to prioritize—but not pursue—happiness?
  • Did I do my best to be self-compassionate (but not self-indulgent or self-pitying) when I failed?
  • Did I do my best to be grateful for the good things that came my way?
  • Did I do my best to pursue flow and steer toward something meaningful and engaging, as opposed to seeking superiority?
  • Did I do my best to not be needy or avoidant?
  • Did I do my best to be a giver rather than a taker or matcher?
  • Did I do my best to practice kindness and generosity in otherish rather than selfless ways?
  • Did I do my best to not be overly controlling of others or outcomes?
  • Did I do my best to take personal responsibility for my happiness (by seeking internal control)?
  • Did I do my best to lead a healthy lifestyle (eating right, moving more, sleeping better)?
  • Did I do my best to exercise smart trust?
  • Did I do my best to be forgiving of others?
  • Did I do my best to look for positive consequences of even negative events?
  • Did I do my best to practice mindfulness?